<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 2.2 Released</title>
	<link>http://www.mantaseosolutions.com/blog/2007/wordpress-22-released/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization and Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Melt du Plooy</title>
		<link>http://www.mantaseosolutions.com/blog/2007/wordpress-22-released/#comment-195</link>
		<author>Melt du Plooy</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 06:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mantaseosolutions.com/blog/2007/wordpress-22-released/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Thanks Vaughn. Are you familiar with movable type ? I've never used it so I cannot comment on it. To me WordPress is great, it certainly is much better than Blogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Vaughn. Are you familiar with movable type ? I&#8217;ve never used it so I cannot comment on it. To me WordPress is great, it certainly is much better than Blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaughn</title>
		<link>http://www.mantaseosolutions.com/blog/2007/wordpress-22-released/#comment-186</link>
		<author>Vaughn</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mantaseosolutions.com/blog/2007/wordpress-22-released/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I moved from b2evolution to wordpress, and it made a huge difference! Much more manageable and the plugins are higher quality. Why is movable type better? Only trouble I had was updating my Hemingway theme for &lt;a href='http://ninjamonkeys.co.za/2007/05/17/hemingway-wordpress-theme-widgetized-for-wordpress-22/' rel="nofollow"&gt;Wordpress 2.2&lt;/a&gt;, because it already had "blocks" which are sort of like widgets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I moved from b2evolution to wordpress, and it made a huge difference! Much more manageable and the plugins are higher quality. Why is movable type better? Only trouble I had was updating my Hemingway theme for <a href='http://ninjamonkeys.co.za/2007/05/17/hemingway-wordpress-theme-widgetized-for-wordpress-22/' rel="nofollow">Wordpress 2.2</a>, because it already had &#8220;blocks&#8221; which are sort of like widgets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melt du Plooy</title>
		<link>http://www.mantaseosolutions.com/blog/2007/wordpress-22-released/#comment-141</link>
		<author>Melt du Plooy</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 11:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mantaseosolutions.com/blog/2007/wordpress-22-released/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Hi Ewan, I wouldn't know. I've moved from Google's Blogger to WordPress and I'm impressed. Are you saying Movable Type is much better ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ewan, I wouldn&#8217;t know. I&#8217;ve moved from Google&#8217;s Blogger to WordPress and I&#8217;m impressed. Are you saying Movable Type is much better ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mantaseosolutions.com/blog/2007/wordpress-22-released/#comment-140</link>
		<author>Ewan</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 11:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mantaseosolutions.com/blog/2007/wordpress-22-released/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>It's still no Movable Type :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s still no Movable Type <img src='http://www.mantaseosolutions.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
